Robert Emmett Ginna nuclear power plant
Robert Emmett Ginna nuclear power plant is a nuclear power station in United States with 1 operating unit totalling 608 MW gross. The site has 1 unit on record in total.
Units
| Unit | Status | Type | Model | Gross MW | Online |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Robert Emmett Ginna nuclear power plant | PWR | WH 2LP (DRYAMB) | 608 | 1970 |
Robert Emmett Ginna nuclear power plant in context
By gross operating capacity Robert Emmett Ginna nuclear power plant is the 54th largest of 54 operating nuclear sites in the United States, holding 1% of the country's operating capacity, and ranks 166th of 172 worldwide.
Its operating unit started up in 1970; the unit is 56.0 years old, older than the median of 45.0 in the United States.
The one unit with both construction and grid dates on record took 3.6 years from construction start to grid connection; the median across all reactors connected in the 1960s is 5.0 years.
The nearest other tracked nuclear sites are Nine Mile Point nuclear power plant (78 km), James A Fitzpatrick nuclear power plant (79 km) and Darlington New nuclear power plant (130 km).
The current net rating of the unit differs from its design net capacity by +19.1% (470 MW at design, 560 MW now).
Build time by unit
| Unit | Construction start | Grid connection | Years | Fleet median, same decade |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Robert Emmett Ginna nuclear power plant | 1966 | 1969 | 3.6 | 5.0 (1960s) |
Nearest tracked nuclear sites
| Site | Country | Distance | Operating GW gross |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nine Mile Point nuclear power plant | United States | 78 km | 2.0 |
| James A Fitzpatrick nuclear power plant | United States | 79 km | 0.8 |
| Darlington New nuclear power plant | Canada | 130 km | - |
How these are worked out: ranks use gross operating capacity; ages count from the start-up year on record, as on the age page; build times run from construction start to grid connection, as on the build-times page; ratings are the tracker's net and design net capacity, as on the uprates page. Distances are straight-line between exact positions, so a site with only an approximate position gets none. A unit missing a date or a rating is left out of the figure that needs it.
Earthquakes nearby
Loading the latest USGS check…
| Time (UTC) | Mag | Depth | Epicentre | Distance |
|---|
Magnitude 4.0 and above within 200 km of Robert Emmett Ginna nuclear power plant's listed coordinates, past 30 days. This is distance, not shaking: it says nothing about damage or any change in operation. Every plant.
| Location | New York, United States |
|---|---|
| Coordinates | 43.2777, -77.3099 |
| Elevation | about 80 mabove sea level |
| Setting | On the shore of a large lake, 2 km from the water |
| Region | Northern America |
| Units by status | Operating: 1 |
Elevation is read at the listed coordinates from a 30 m terrain model (SRTM 30 m). Two independent models differ by a median of 6 m across our plants and by up to about 40 m on steep or coastal ground, and a point on a shoreline can read as sea level. Distance to the water is measured to a generalised 1:10 million coastline, so a few kilometres or less is not resolved. This is context, not a design-basis or flood-risk figure.
| Owners | Exelon Corp |
|---|---|
| Operators | Exelon Generation |
Put this plant on your own page: embed a card, or compare it with another plant.
Sources
- Global Nuclear Power Tracker, Global Energy Monitor, August 2026 release , CC BY 4.0 · retrieved 2026-09-06
- GEM.wiki entry (further reading) , CC BY-SA 4.0, linked, not quoted
How these sources are used, including the corrections applied on top of them and what is deliberately left blank · download the underlying data