Skip to content

What HALEU is and where it comes from

HALEU is uranium enriched above 5% and below 20% U-235, higher than the fuel any commercial Western power reactor uses today. About two thirds of advanced reactor and SMR designs need it. Until October 2023 no Western facility produced any. One still enriches to it, Centrus at Piketon, which made 900 kilograms in the year to mid-2026; everything else on this page is either downblended weapons material, which is a finite stock rather than an industry, or a plant that does not exist yet. Note the unit: kilograms, against tonnes everywhere else in this chain. Note also the flags: every facility here is American except one.

Facilities listed
8
across 2 countries
Operating
4
1 under construction
Planned
3
none abandoned
Operating capacity
4,000
kg HALEU total, where published

Higher enrichment lets a reactor run longer between refuellings, hold a smaller core, and use fuel forms that conventional enrichment cannot support. That is why so many advanced designs specify it: TRISO-fuelled high-temperature reactors, sodium-cooled fast reactors like Natrium, and most molten salt concepts all assume HALEU.

The 20% ceiling is not a technical limit but a non-proliferation one. Above 20%, uranium is classified as highly enriched and attracts an entirely different security and safeguards regime. HALEU sits deliberately just underneath that line.

The supply position is the problem. Russia, through Tenex, was the only established commercial HALEU supplier in the world, and the 2024 US import ban closed that route. What exists in its place is small and mostly not yet built:

  • Centrus at Piketon runs a demonstration cascade producing about 900 kg a year, and
  • received a $900 million DOE task order in 2026 to expand to commercial scale.
  • Downblending surplus weapons-grade uranium at Savannah River will yield roughly 3.1
  • tonnes total. That is a finite stock, not a supply chain.
  • Urenco targets HALEU production at Capenhurst in 2031.
  • Orano is developing Project IKE at Oak Ridge with DOE support.
  • X-energy's TRISO-X plant at Oak Ridge, which turns HALEU into finished pebbles, is
  • targeted for completion in the first half of 2028.

Set those dates against the SMR developers promising units in the late 2020s and the mismatch is plain. This is the single strongest reason to be sceptical of any advanced reactor timeline: the reactor can be licensed and built, and still have nothing to run on.

Why this stage is a chokepoint

The most severe constraint in the entire chain, and the newest. Western annual production is measured in hundreds of kilograms while a single small reactor's first core needs several tonnes. Every HALEU-dependent design on the SMR tracker is competing for the same barely-existent supply. The money has now been committed, four suppliers selected under contracts worth up to $2.7 billion, Centrus targeting twelve tonnes a year and Orano a plant the size of Georges Besse II. The dates are what matter: Centrus expects first production from new cascades in 2029 and Orano operations in 2032, which is eight years from the award. Nothing that gets decided now moves the supply position this decade.

What this stage costs. Nobody publishes a HALEU price. There is no spot market, no long-term indicator, and too few transactions to assess one. The enrichment indicator on fuel market prices (US$ 200.00 per SWU spot in August 2026) sets a floor rather than a price: HALEU takes far more separative work per kilogram than reactor-grade LEU, and the licensing and transport requirements above 10% U-235 are not priced into that figure at all.

Facilities

Facility OperatorCountry Capacity Status
Savannah River Site HEU downblending US Department of Energy United States 3,100kg HALEU total operating
American Centrifuge Plant, Piketon Centrus Energy Corp United States 900kg HALEU/yr operating
BWXT TRISO facility, Gillette BWX Technologies United States not disclosed planned
General Matter General Matter United States not disclosed planned
Idaho National Laboratory EBR-II downblending US Department of Energy United States not disclosed operating
Nuclear Fuel Services, Erwin BWX Technologies United States not disclosed operating
TRISO-X Fuel Facility (TX-1), Oak Ridge X-energy United States not disclosed construction
Urenco Capenhurst HALEU line Urenco United Kingdom not disclosed planned

Sources

How these sources are used, including the corrections applied on top of them and what is deliberately left blank · download the underlying data

Try

Searches every page: 1,823 reactors, 592 plants, 158 fuel chain facilities, companies, designs, accidents and notes.